| ARCHETYPE ID | openEHR-EHR-EVALUATION.advance_intervention_decisions.v1 |
|---|---|
| Concept | Advance intervention decisions |
| Description | Anticipatory decisions about the overall intent of care and possible interventions (including treatments, activities, and diagnostic or therapeutic procedures), asserted by a clinician. |
| Use | Use to record anticipatory decisions about the overall intent of care and possible interventions for an individual. The decisions will support clinicians by providing guidance regarding possible treatments, activities, and diagnostic or therapeutic procedures that may be life-saving, life-prolonging or cause undesirable side effects. This archetype is intended to be used as part of integrated care or end-of-life planning, and not as a reaction to an acute or emergency situation. Each decision should be made in response to the individual's overall health and general circumstances, and usually asserted by a clinician after consideration of the individual's advance care directives or stated preferences. It may be necessary to record temporary overrides to usual advance intervention decisions in specific circumstances, for example during pregnancy or preoperatively. In this situation it will be necessary to record a separate instance of this archetype, using a combination of relevant validity and review dates. |
| Misuse | Not to be used to record an 'Advance care directive' or the individual's preferences for care - use EVALUATION.advance_care_directive for this purpose. Not to be used to record the orders required as a consequence of the decisions made and recorded using this archetype. Use specific INSTRUCTION or ACTION archetypes for this purpose. |
| Purpose | To record anticipatory decisions about the overall intent of care and possible interventions, usually asserted by a clinician. |
| References | Breault JL. DNR, DNAR, or AND? Is Language Important? Ochsner J. 2011 Winter;11(4):302-6. PMID: 22190879; PMCID: PMC3241061. Salins N, Gursahani R, Mathur R, Iyer S, Macaden S, Simha N, Mani RK, Rajagopal MR. Definition of Terms Used in Limitation of Treatment and Providing Palliative Care at the End of Life: The Indian Council of Medical Research Commission Report. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2018 Apr;22(4):249-262. doi: 10.4103/ijccm.IJCCM_165_18. PMID: 29743764; PMCID: PMC5930529. Thomas RL, Zubair MY, Hayes B, Ashby MA. Goals of care: a clinical framework for limitation of medical treatment. Med J Aust. 2014 Oct 20;201(8):452-5. doi: 10.5694/mja14.00623. PMID: 25332031. ZIB Centrum. [Internet]. Netherlands: Nictiz. BehandelAanwijzing-v3.2(2019NL); 2020 Feb 03. Available from: https://zibs.nl/wiki/BehandelAanwijzing-v3.2(2019NL) |
| Copyright | © openEHR Foundation |
| Authors | Author name: Heather Leslie Organisation: Atomica Informatics, Australia Email: heather.leslie@atomicainformatics.com Date originally authored: 2020-07-31 |
| Other Details Language | Author name: Heather Leslie Organisation: Atomica Informatics, Australia Email: heather.leslie@atomicainformatics.com Date originally authored: 2020-07-31 |
| Other Details (Language Independent) |
|
| Keywords | DNR, DNAR, DNACPR, NFR, resuscitation, resuscitate, EoL, end of life, directive, preference, goal, care, intervention, ceiling, limit, limitation, treatment, scope, escalation, intent, EOLC, life-prolonging, life-saving, palliative, decision, direction |
| Lifecycle | published |
| UID | fb7b27e1-b008-4aee-b692-148e81aca05f |
| Language used | en |
| Citeable Identifier | 1246.145.1916 |
| Revision Number | 1.0.0 |
| protocol | |
| Last updated | Last updated: The date and/or time when the Advance intervention decisions were last updated. |
| Valid period start | Valid period start: The date/time that marks the beginning of the valid period of time for the Advance intervention decisions. |
| Valid period end | Valid period end: The date/time that marks the conclusion of the valid period of time for the Advance intervention decisions. 'Valid period end' may often overlap with 'Review due date'. However, they may need to be recorded separately in circumstances where a document has an extended period of validity but requires an interim review. That may be due to changed personal circumstances/events or local policy. |
| Review due | Review due: The date when review of the Advance intervention decisions are due. |
| Mandate | Mandate: Description of any legislation or other authoritative guidance that apply. For example: an advance care directive. Choice of:
|
| Digital representation | Digital representation: Digital document, image or video representing these Advance intervention decisions. Include: openEHR-EHR-CLUSTER.multimedia_ |
| Document location | Document location: Information about the physical or digital location of the advance intervention decisions record. |
| Location | Location: Physical or digital location of the Advance intervention decisions record. Choice of:
|
| Copy holder | Copy holder: Details of a person who has a copy of the Advance intervention decisions record. Comment: For example, 'John Smith, Lawyer'. Include: All not explicitly excluded archetypes |
| Extension | Extension: Additional information required to extend the model with local content or to align with other reference models or formalisms. For example: local information requirements; or additional metadata to align with FHIR. Include: All not explicitly excluded archetypes |
| data | |
| Intent of care | Intent of care: The overall intent for future care and treatment for the individual. The proposed value set is based on the MJA reference. Coding the intent of care with an external terminology is preferred, where possible. Choice of:
|
| Rationale | Rationale: Narrative description about the logic and justification for the 'Intent of care' decision. |
| Decisions description | Decisions description: Narrative description about all advance intervention decisions, including the CPR decision. May be used to record a narrative overview of the advance intervention decision that reflect the specific circumstances for the individual. This includes any limitations, or conditional circumstances applicable, to interventions. This description may or may not be supported by structured data, recorded using the ‘Per intervention’ cluster. If both this narrative description and ‘Per intervention’ structured data is recorded, caution is required as there is a potential risk of divergence. This data element may be used to capture legacy data that is not available in a structured format. |
| CPR decision | CPR decision: Decision about the extent of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) intervention appropriate for this individual. Choice of:
|
| Per intervention | Per intervention: Details of the decision about possible treatments or activities that may be life-saving, life-prolonging or cause undesirable side effects. |
| Intervention | Intervention: Name of the possible treatment, procedure or activity. While this archetype is intended for all clinical decisions about possible future interventions, the proposed DV_CODED_TEXT value set for the 'Intervention' data element is deliberately not intended to be exhaustive. Instead it has been designed to be inclusive of most of the common life-saving treatments within an emergency context. The alternate choice of the DV_TEXT option can be used to add a local value set or bind to an alternative external value set within a template. Choice of:
|
| Decision | Decision: Decision about the identified intervention.
|
| Precondition | Precondition: Description of the circumstance/s in which a 'Conditional recommendation' is applicable. This data element is only relevant if the 'Conditional recommendation' option is selected in the 'Decision' data element. For example:' "Transfer to hospital is only applicable in the circumstances where the individual suffers a fracture and requires immobilization for pain relief.# |
| Comment | Comment: Additional narrative about the intervention decision, not captured in other fields. For example: the justification or rationale for the intervention decision. |
| Additional details | Additional details: Additional structured details about advance intervention decisions. For example: people involved in the decision-making process, if it is not possible to use the reference model participations; or additional locally relevant considerations. Include: All not explicitly excluded archetypes |
| Patient awareness | Patient awareness: Narrative description about awareness of the Advance intervention decisions by the individual. For example: the capacity of the patient to understand the decisions. |
| Carer awareness | Carer awareness: Narrative description about awareness of the Advance intervention decisions by family, carers or legal proxy. For example: the individual has no family. |
| Overall comment | Overall comment: Additional narrative about all advance intervention decisions, not captured in other fields. |
| Other contributors | Dag Aarhus, Vestre Viken HF, Norway Nuno Abreu, Oporto Hospital Center, Portugal Tor Aksel Aasmundstad, Oslo University Hospital, Norway Tomas Alme, Norway Vebjørn Arntzen, Oslo University Hospital, Norway (openEHR Editor) Kari-Ann Baarlid, Nasjonalforeningen for folkehelsen, Norway Silje Ljosland Bakke, Helse Vest IKT AS, Norway (openEHR Editor) Terje Bektesevic Holmlund, UiT Norges arktiske universitet, Norway SB Bhattacharyya, Sudisa Consultancy Services, India Colin Brown, NHS Scotland SCIMP, United Kingdom Greg Burch, Tiny Medical Apps, United Kingdom Gry Caroline Aarnes, Nasjonalforeningen for folkehelsen, Norway Fatemeh Chalabianloo, Helse Bergen, Norway Bjørn Christensen, Helse Bergen HF, Norway Oona Dunlop, Oslo University Hospital, Norway Vibeche Fashing, Norwegian Cancer Society, Norway Arild Faxvaag, NTNU, Norway Grant Forrest, Lunaria Ltd, United Kingdom Reidun Førde, Prof emirata, University of Oslo, Norway Maria G, Norway Heather Grain, Llewelyn Grain Informatics, Australia Anne Grimstvedt Kvalvik, Haraldsplass Diakonale sykehus, Norway Joost Holslag, Nedap, Netherlands Evelyn Hovenga, EJSH Consulting, Australia Keltie Jamieson, NSHA, Canada Lars Morgan Karlsen, DIPS ASA, Norway Heidi Koikkalainen, United Kingdom Nils Kolstrup, Skansen Legekontor og Nasjonalt Senter for samhandling og telemedisin, Norway Tomi Laptoš, Marand, Slovenia Heather Leslie, Atomica Informatics, Australia (openEHR Editor) Manisha Mantri, C-DAC, India Ian McNicoll, freshEHR Clinical Informatics, United Kingdom Per Meinich, Helse Sør-Øst RHF, Norway Paul Miller, NES Digital Service, NHS Scotland, United Kingdom Bjoern Naess, DIPS ASA, Norway Arunakiry Natarajan, management4health, Germany Svenne Naumann, Finnmarkssykehuset, Norway Andrej Orel, Marand d.o.o., Slovenia Vanessa Pereira, Better - Pathfinder, Portugal Anne Rita Øksengård, Nasjonalforeningen for folkehelsen, Norway Jussara Rotzsch, Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz, Brazil Nina Saastad, Norwegian Cancer Society, Norway Joran Slaaen, Norwegian Cancer Society, Norway Norwegian Review Summary, Nasjonal IKT HF, Norway Nyree Taylor, Ocean Informatics, Australia Rowan Thomas, St. Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Australia John Tore Valand, Helse Bergen, Norway (openEHR Editor) Marc Vali Ahmed, Oslo University Hospital, Norway Lin Zhang, Taikang Insurance Group, China |
| Translators |
|