ARCHETYPE Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment (CPAx) tool (openEHR-EHR-OBSERVATION.cpax.v1)

ARCHETYPE IDopenEHR-EHR-OBSERVATION.cpax.v1
ConceptChelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment (CPAx) tool
DescriptionA scoring system to measure physical morbidity in critical care.
UseUse to record the results for each component parameter for the Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment Tool (CPAx).
PurposeTo record the results for each component parameter for the Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment Tool (CPAx).
ReferencesCorner EJ, Wood H, Englebretsen C, Thomas A, Grant RL, Nikoletou D, Soni N. The Chelsea critical care physical assessment tool (CPAx): validation of an innovative new tool to measure physical morbidity in the general adult critical care population; an observational proof-of-concept pilot study. Physiotherapy. 2013 Mar;99(1):33-41. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2012.01.003. Epub 2012 Mar 30. PubMed PMID: 23219649.

Norwegian Version of the Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment Tool (CPAx-NOR): Translation, Face Validity, Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Inter-Rater Reliability - PubMed (nih.gov). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37568435/
Copyright© openEHR Foundation
AuthorsAuthor name: Silje Ljosland Bakke
Organisation: Helse Vest IKT AS
Email: silje.ljosland.bakke@helse-vest-ikt.no
Date originally authored: 2023-04-14
Other Details LanguageAuthor name: Silje Ljosland Bakke
Organisation: Helse Vest IKT AS
Email: silje.ljosland.bakke@helse-vest-ikt.no
Date originally authored: 2023-04-14
Other Details (Language Independent)
  • Licence: This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/.
  • Custodian Organisation: openEHR Foundation
  • References: Corner EJ, Wood H, Englebretsen C, Thomas A, Grant RL, Nikoletou D, Soni N. The Chelsea critical care physical assessment tool (CPAx): validation of an innovative new tool to measure physical morbidity in the general adult critical care population; an observational proof-of-concept pilot study. Physiotherapy. 2013 Mar;99(1):33-41. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2012.01.003. Epub 2012 Mar 30. PubMed PMID: 23219649. Norwegian Version of the Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment Tool (CPAx-NOR): Translation, Face Validity, Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Inter-Rater Reliability - PubMed (nih.gov). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37568435/
  • Original Namespace: org.openehr
  • Original Publisher: openEHR Foundation
  • Custodian Namespace: org.openehr
  • MD5-CAM-1.0.1: C4FD37293618CD1876B8BEB9B27BCA30
  • Build Uid: ebf538e3-dc93-4772-b1d4-53d3b1d26e8e
  • Revision: 1.0.0
Keywords
Lifecyclepublished
UIDe829956d-b6f5-45c7-9236-5461231f55da
Language useden
Citeable Identifier1246.145.2871
Revision Number1.0.0
protocol
ExtensionExtension: Additional information required to extend the model with local content or to align with other reference models or formalisms.
For example: local information requirements; or additional metadata to align with FHIR.
Include:
All not explicitly excluded archetypes
data
Respiratory functionRespiratory function: 0: Complete ventilator dependence. Mandatory breaths only. May be fully sedated/ paralysed
1: Ventilator dependence. Mandatory breaths with some spontaneous effort
2: Spontaneously breathing with continuous invasive or non-invasive ventilatory support
3: Spontaneously breathing with intermittent invasive or non-invasive ventilatory supportor continuous high flow oxygen (>15 L)
4: Receiving standardoxygen therapy (<15L)
5: Self-ventilating with no oxygen therapy
CoughCough: 0: Absent cough, may be fully sedated or paralysed
1: Cough stimulated on deep suctioning only
2: Weak ineffective voluntary cough, unable to clear independently (e.g. requires deep suction)
3: Weak, partially effective voluntary cough, sometimes able to clear secretions (e.g. requires Yankauer suctioning)
4: Effective cough, clearing secretions with airways clearance techniques
5: Consistent effective voluntary cough, clearing secretions independently
Moving within the bed (e.g. rolling)Moving within the bed (e.g. rolling): 0: Unable, maybe fully sedated/ paralysed
1: Initiates movement. Requires assistance of two or more people (maximal)
2: Initiates movement. Requires assistance of at least one person (moderate)
3: Initiates movement. Requires assistance of one person (minimal)
4: Independent in ≥3 seconds
5: Independent in <3 seconds
Supine to sitting on the edge of the bedSupine to sitting on the edge of the bed: 0: Unable/unstable
1: Initiates movement. Requires assistance of two or more people (maximal)
2: Initiates movement. Requires assistance of at least one person (moderate)
3: Initiates movement. Requires assistance of one person (minimal)
4: Independent in ≥3 seconds
5: Independent in <3 seconds
Dynamic sitting (i.e. when sitting on the edge of the bed/unsupported sitting)Dynamic sitting (i.e. when sitting on the edge of the bed/unsupported sitting): 0: Unable/unstable
1: Requires assistance of two or more people (maximal)
2: Requires assistance of at least one person (moderate)
3: Requires assistance of one person (minimal)
4: Independent with some dynamic sitting balance (i.e. able to alter trunk position within base of support)
5: Independent with full dynamic sitting balance (i.e. able to reach out of base of support)
Standing balanceStanding balance: 0: Unable/unstable/bedbound
1: Tilt table or similar
2: Standing hoist or similar
3: Dependent on frame, crutches or similar
4: Independent without aids
5: Independent without aids and full dynamic standing balance (i.e. able to reach out of base of support)
Sit to stand (starting position: ≤90º hip flexion)Sit to stand (starting position: ≤90º hip flexion): 0: Unable/unstable
1: Sit to stand with maximal assistance (standing hoist or similar)
2: Sit to stand with moderate assistance (e.g. one or two people)
3: Sit to stand with minimal assistance (e.g. one person)
4: Sit to stand independently pushing through arms of the chair
5: Sit to stand independently without upper limb involvement
Transferring from bed to chairTransferring from bed to chair: 0: Unable/unstable
1: Full hoist
2: Standing hoist or similar
3: Pivot transfer (no stepping) with mobility aid or physical assistance
4: Stand and step transfer with mobility aid or physical assistance
5: Independent transfer without equipment
SteppingStepping: 0: Unable/unstable
1: Using a standing hoist or similar
2: Using mobility aids and assistance of at least one person (moderate)
3: Using mobility aid and assistance of one person (minimal)
4: Using mobility aid or assistance of one person (minimal)
5: Independent without aid
Grip strength (predicted mean for age and gender on the strongest hand)Grip strength (predicted mean for age and gender on the strongest hand): 0: Unable to assess
1: <20%
2: <40%
3: <60%
4: <80%
5: ≥80%
Total scoreTotal score: The total sum of each component variable for the Chelsea Critical Care Physical Tool.
min: >=0; max: <=50

events
Any eventAny event: Default, unspecified point in time or interval event which may be explicitly defined in a template or at run-time.
Other contributorsVebjørn Arntzen, Oslo University Hospital, varntzen@ous-hf.no
Translators
  • Norwegian Bokmål: Charlotte Marie Schanke, Stein Arne Rimehaug, Silje Ljosland Bakke, Sunnaas Hospital, Helse Vest IKT AS, Charlotte.Marie.Schanke@sunnaas.no, sterim@sunnaas.no, silje.ljosland.bakke@helse-vest-ikt.no